Question: Why is taking pictures of images in Buddhist temples sometimes not allowed?
Answer: Below are some common reasons (with some possible refutations). However, the ‘no photography’ rule should be respected, (if the refutations are hard to explain there and then for permission).
[1] Disruption: To maintain the sacred atmosphere of the hall. (However, pictures can be taken without causing the slightest disruption at all.)
[2] Disrespect: To show respect to the ones represented by the images. (However, if they are enlightened beings, why would they take any offence? What more, they are not those images per se. Pictures can be taken respectfully too, to express respect.)
[3] Disturbance: To prevent disturbing others expressing respect and offering prayers by blocking them with big and noisy cameras. And to protect their privacy. (However, pictures can be taken silently and discreetly, with mindfulness of not inconveniencing anyone at all.)
[4] Damage: To not damage the images with flash photography. (However, pictures can be taken without using flash at all.)
[5] Trivialisation: To not be irreverent by posing with the images inappropriately. (However, pictures of only the images can be taken, without trivialising them at all.)
[6] Abuse: To prevent monetisation and abuse of images. (However, well taken pictures can help preserve and share historically significant images for posterity’s sake, free of charge too.)
It is surely better that visitors from afar return home, with wonderful photographic memories as reminders of the Buddhist temples visited, along with their inspiring images, than with none at all? If so, perhaps respectful photographing of images should be allowed?
